Mere pichale lekh mein mainne Baibal ādhārit us nīv ko dekha tha ki – kaise hamen yah dekhana chāhie ki ham Parameśvar ke svarūp mein rache hue hain. Parantu Ved Pustak (Baibal) – is nīv par aur āge kī or vikās karatī hai. Apane Parameśvar kī ārādhana ke lie Purāne Niyam ke Ibrāniyon ke dvāra pavitr gīton aur bhajanon ke sangrah ke rūp mein Bhajan Sanhita upayog kī jātī thī. Bhajan 14 Rāja Daūd (jo ek rśi bhī tha) ke dvāra lagabhag 100 Isa Pūrv mein racha gaya tha, aur usaka yah bhajan jīvan-kī-vastusthiti ko Parameśvar ke drśtikon se dekhane ka varnan karata hai.
Parameśvar ne Svarg mein se manuśyon par drśti kī, ki dekhe ki koī buddhimān, koī Parameśvar ka khojī hai ya nahin, ve sab bhatak gae, ve sab bhraśt ho gae; koī sukarmī nahin, ek bhī nahin. (Bhajan Sanhita 14: 2-3)
Vāky ‘bhraśt ho gae’ ka upayog pūrī mānavajāti ke vivaran ko dene ke lie kiya gaya hai. Kyonki yah kuch aisī bāt hai jo ham ban gae hain, yahān par bhraśtata ka ullekh Parameśvar ke svarūp mein rache hue hone kī ārambhik sthiti ke lie kiya gaya hai. Yah sandarbh kahata hai ki yah bhraśtata svayan mein hī nirdhārit kī huī Parameśvar se prthak ātm-nirbharata hai (‘Ve’ sabhī ‘Parameśvar ka khojī’ banane se ‘bhatak gae hain’), aur sāth hī koī bhī ‘bhale’ ke kāry ko nahin kar raha hai .
Alvas aur Orkas ke bāre mein sochana
Prthvī-ke-madhy mein rahane vāle – Orkas ke bāre mein sarvottam rūp se samajhane ke lie Lord āph da Rings arthāt Angūthī ka Svāmī philm ek udāharan hai. Dikhane, vyavahār aur prthvī ke sāth unake vyavahār mein Orkas ghrnit prāniyon ke jaise the. Tathāpi Orkas Alvas kī santānen jo saūron ke
Dvāra bhraśt ho gaya tha. Jab āp prakrti ke sāth dikhaī dene vālī tejasvī, sadvabhāvapūrn aur sambandh ko dekhate hain jo Alvas (Loglos ke bāre mein sochen) ke the aur yah pahachān lete hain ki bhraśt Orkas kabhī Alvas the jo bhraśt ho gae tab āp jo kuch yahān logon ke bāre mein kaha gaya hai use adhik samajh paenge. Parameśvar ne Alvas kī rachana kī thī parantu ve Orkas ban gae.
Yah us bāt ke lie bilkul sahī hai jise hamane logon ke madhy mein viśvavyāpī pravrtti ke rūp mein dhyān diya hai, arthāt svayan ke pāpon ke prati jāgarūk aur isase śuddh hone kī āvaśyakata – jaisa kī Kumbh Mela Tyauhār mein dikhalāya gaya hai. Is tarah se ham yahān par is drśtikon par pahuncate hain: logon ke sanvedanaśīl, vyaktigat aur naitik hone ke Baibal ādhārit ārambhik bindu ka jo ki bahut hī adhik śikśāprad hai, parantu tathāpi bhraśt bhī, us bāt ke lie sahī hai jise hamen svayan ke bāre mein dekhate hain. Logon ke svayan ke ānkalan ke prati – yah chaturaī pahachān mein ā jātī hai ki hamamen nihit naitik svabhāv hai jise badī āsānī se andekha kiya ja sakata hai kyonki hamāre vyavahār ke kāry vāstav mein – is bhraśtata ke kāran – kabhī bhī usake anurūp nahin hote hain jisakī māng yah svabhāv karata hai. Baibal kī soch manuśy ke jīvan ke liye bilkul sahī hai. Tathāpi, yah ek spaśt praśn ko utpann kar detī hai: kyon Parameśvar ne hamen is tarah se – ek naitik diśāsūchak ke sāth racha aur tathāpi yah bhraśt hai? Prasiddh nāstik Kristofar Hacchins aise śikāyat karata hai:
“….Yadi Parameśvar vāstav mein chāhata ki log is tarah ke vichāron se svatantr hon [arthāt bhraśtata se bhare hue], to use aur adhik sāvadhānī se ek bhinn prajāti ka aviśkār karana cāhie.” Kristofar Hacchins. 2007. Parameśvar mahān nahin hai: Kaise dharm sab kuch ko kharāb kar deta hai. Prśth 100.
Parantu yahī vah bāt hai jahān par ākar vah apanī jaldabājī mein Baibal ke gyān ko svīkār karane se inkār kar deta hai arthāt vah ek bahut hī mahatvapūrn bāt ko kho deta hai. Baibal aisa nahin kahatī hai ki Parameśvar ne hamen is tarīke se banāya hai, parantu kyonki ārambhik srśti ke paśchāt se kuch bahut hī bura ghatit ho gaya jo mānav ko is tarah-kī-vastu – sthiti mein le āya. Mānav itihās mein usakī srśti hone ke paśchāt ek mahatvapūrn ghatana ghatit ho gaī. Pratham manuśy ne Parameśvar kī āgya tod dī, jaisa ki utpatti mein varnit kiya gaya hai – Baibal (Ved Pustak) kī pahalī aur sabase pratham pustak, aur unake dvāra āgya pālan na kie jāne ke kāran ve parivartit aur bhraśt ho gae. Is lie hī ham ab tamas, ya andhakār mein jīvan vyatīt karate hain.
Manuśy ka pāp mein Girana
Mānavīy itihās mein is ghatana ko aksar Patan mein Girana kah kar pukāra jāta hai. Adam, pratham purūś, Parameśvar ke dvāra racha gaya tha. Parameśvar aur Adam ke madhy mein ek tarah ka karār tha, jaise vivāh mein viśvāsayogyata hoti hai, aur Adam ne ise tod diya. Baibal varnan karatī hai ki Adam ne ‘bhale aur bure ke gyān ke vrkś’ ke phal mein se tod kar kha liya, yadyapi ve sahamat the ki ve is vrkś mein se tod kar nahin khaenge. Samajhauta aur svayan vrkś ne, Adam ko Parameśvar ke prati viśvāsayogy rahana hai ya nahin ke lie chunāv karane kī svatantr iccha de dī. Adam ko Parameśvar ke svarūp mein racha gaya tha, aur use Parameśvar ke sāth mitrata ke sambandh mein rakha gaya tha. Parantu srśti ke prati ādam ke pās kisī tarah ka koī chunāv nahin tha, isalie Parameśvar ne usako hone diya ki vah Parameśvar ke sāth usakī mitrata ko banae rakhane ka chunāv kar sakata tha. Thīk vaise hī jaise yadi baithana asambhav ho to khade rahane ka chunāv vāstavik nahin hota, Parameśvar ke prati Adam kī mitrata aur bharosa bhī ek chunāv kī tarah hī thī. Yah chunāv ek āgya ke ūpar ādhārit thī ki ek vrkś ke phal ko nahin khāna hai. Aur ādam ne vidroh karane ko cun liya. Jo kuch ādam ne apane vidroh se ārambh kiya vah na-rūkate-hue ek ke paśchāt dūsarī Pīdhī mein āj ke din tak chalata chala ā raha hai. Isaka kya arth hai ise ham apane agale lekh mein dekhenge.